Here is a cool video that shows in super slow motion what happens when a raindrop hits a puddle:
They even have some guy who explains the bouncing effect.
Here is a cool video that shows in super slow motion what happens when a raindrop hits a puddle:
They even have some guy who explains the bouncing effect.
Our friends at Haaretz have done it again. They manage to twist the news to make it sound completely different from what actually happened while still strictly telling the truth.
Yesterday, a Jewish family moved into a house in the Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood in East Jerusalem.
Here is how Arutz 7 described the event:
“The family moved into their new home in the Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood, after the High Court ruled that land is owned by Jews. However, an Arab family remains in a part of the multi-unit building.”
The article goes on with:
“Police escorted the new family into their home on Tuesday even though one Arab family refuses to move out, despite the court approval for the Jewish family to take over the property. Police are at the scene to prevent a confrontation by protesting Arabs and pro-Arab groups and are trying to convince the Arab family to leave peacefully.”
Now lets look at how Haaretz presented the story.
First, lets see the headline:
Settlers force Palestinians out of East Jerusalem home
Check that out – it was the settlers who forced out the Arabs. All of the sudden, the law doesn’t matter. It’s those settlers who did something wrong here. (Note: the article has since been changed on the web site but the main points still apply to the new article as well.)
Now let’s see how they describe in the article what happened:
“Rioting settlers forced a Palestinian family from the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah out of their home on Tuesday, after the district court denied the residents' appeal to remain on the premises.”
First, it was rioting settlers. Not settlers who just wanted to finally move into their house.
Second, of course the article has to use the Arab name for the neighborhood Sheikh Jarrah – to further delegitimize the rights of any Jews to be there.
Next, the sentence sounds like the Jews had minimal right to the house as opposed to the years and years of court battles that they rightful owners had to go through to finally have the right to evict the illegal Arab squatters.
I don’t know why I get upset every time Haaretz does this, but here it is again.
I have received a number of comments about my lack of posting. I don’t want anyone to say that I am cut from my audience (whomever of you are left) and that I am out of touch with the common man. So, in order to get a post up I am going the easy way and posting a video.
It is in ad for Intel and it is quite funny. Interesting to see if you laugh with or about the people in the ad.
Embedding doesn't seem to work, but click here to see the ad.Following up on the jump rope like you have never seen it video, here is some bike riding like you wouldn’t believe.
It starts off a little slow, but hang in there - this guy does things on a bike that will blow your mind:
Growing up, jumping rope was always thought of a kind of girlish. This assessment changed a bit when we realized that boxers jumper rope since it was great exercise and good for your coordination as well.
But, I never knew jumping rope can be for show as well.
Check out this video:
After enough nudging by various people (can you say shiputzim ??), the time has come to maybe post again.
Instead of politics or anything, I have been saving this gem up.
This video has been making the rounds , and for those of you haven’t seen it, its a real classic:
(or perhaps this post should have been called Why Doesn’t Olmert Get It)
A mind boggling story appeared in Haaretz of all places today. You can find the whole thing here.
For those of you too lazy too click through or even for those who will, I’ll quote the amazing part here:
“After Olmert updated Bush on Israel's indirect talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad, the U.S. president demanded, "Why do you want to give Assad the Golan for nothing?" the sources said.
"It's not for nothing," Olmert insisted. "It's in exchange for a change in the region's strategic alignment."
Bush persisted: "Why should you believe him?" And to that, Olmert did not reply. “
For all his problems, even Bush realizes its pointless to give away the Golan to Syria. Why doesn’t Olmert get it?
I know some of us (and me included) think it’s cool when we multiple two digit numbers in our head, but this guy has us all beat.
Enjoy.
This may not actually interest you as it does me, but since I probably know way more about the various NASA projects in the ‘50s and ‘60s (Mercury, Gemini and Apollo) than is really necessary, I found this latest Google development to be fascinating.
It seems that Google is now hosting and has available for viewing all the old Life images.
What makes this good is that Life of course has tons of pictures from their deal with NASA in the 50’s and 60’s.
For example, type in 1960s NASA and you will get to see all kinds of goodies like:
In today’s Headline of the Day segment, we have a classic headline. You can zoom in an read the fine print, but even so it’s still funny.
Mrs. S. mentioned how she was expecting some election analysis which seems to be a reasonable thought.
The truth is I don’t have much to say on the matter. I was/am not a big fan of Obama and you have to wonder how much damage he can do in four years. For most of us, our main focus is of course how things will affect Israel and I not optimistic on that – especially with Israeli Prime Ministers who will cave in to American pressure (and unfortunately I am including Bibi in that list.)
In addition, on a more local American scene, now that the Democrats control both Congress and the White House, they will be able to appoint as liberal judges and justices as they want.
But enough on that pessimism. The truth is by Monday night we knew that Obama was going to win.
For the past 18 elections going back to 1940, the Redskins are 17-1 in picking the winner.
It goes like this: If the Washington Redskins win their last home game before the election, then the incumbent party wins. If they lose, then the other party wins. Actually, until 2004, this had successfully predicted 17 straight elections. In 2004, the Redskins lost to the Green Bay Packers, but the incumbent Republicans (George Bush) won anyways.
But even at 17-1, it’s tough to argue with success.
And lo and behold, the Redskins had to go and lose Monday night to the Steelers – presaging the Democratic victory.
And so us Redskins fans got stuck with a double whammy this week: both the Redskins and McCain losing.
Today’s Quote of the Day brings this piece of wisdom:
"Children are all foreigners." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
Kids may not understand this quote, but I don’t think parents need any explanation at all.
I never was a big fan of Garfield. He was fun to try to draw but that was about it.
I have recently discovered a site (Garfield Minus Garfield) that offers a new way to read the comic strip. The site removes Garfield from every frame leaving only Jon doing seemingly odd things.
The site describes itself as:
Garfield Minus Garfield is a site dedicated to removing Garfield from the Garfield comic strips in order to reveal the existential angst of a certain young Mr. Jon Arbuckle.
Here is a sampling:
The site also is very rss friendly and seems to me the way to read it. Even without Garfield, the comic is still not great, but it is amusing on some level that even a one sided conversation can still make some kind of sense.
It also makes you wonder how many other things – including real conversations – in life would still make sense if you take out one of the participants.
I think a fair number of them will which doesn’t say much for those converssations or the participants themselves.
If you were wondering how the whole banking mess happened and what the subprime crisis means, here is a great clip to explain it.
It is actually a couple of British comedians and was made apparently in 2007:
The amazing thing is - if these comedians understood it so well then, how come nobody else did until the whole thing blew up in everybody's faces.
As we enter the final leg of various election seasons, it pays to remember today’s Quote of the Day:
Statistician: A man who believes figures don't lie, but admits that under analysis some of them won't stand up either. -- Evan Esar
There has been some questions on who sang the Adon Olam in the Master Of The Universe post.
The group that sings it is called A.K.A Pella. You can hear snippets of Adon Olam and other songs from that CD here. A careful listener might recognize most of the tunes from elsewhere. A lot of the songs seem to have a similar meaning or theme as the original song. (For example listen to the clip for Ki Malachav and see if you recognize it.)
For the curious amongst you, Adon Olam seems to be based on this song ( I am not sure of any meaning connection there – though it is a nice tune):
Here is another video set to one of their songs (SImilar to how the Adon Olam one was – though not the same powerful message). I am guessing a few of you will recognize the tune ( In this case I think the connection to the original is more obvious):
If you want, you can hear clips from their first and second more traditional CDs as well.
Here is also one of the lead singers of the group (Zevi Daniels), singing the National Anthem at a recent Orioles game:
Interestingly, people’s reactions to the video differ as upon seeing the clip someone commented to me: “Did you see the sheitel on his wife?”
I should also point out that I have never heard one of their whole CDs and just know them from these clips.
I have to give a shout out here to ASG of Our Shiputzim fame. On his recommendation, I installed Windows Live Writer Beta.
It definitely seems much easier to write entries this way rather then the standard blogger web interface. I’m not saying the entries will be more frequent now, but I think I will enjoy writing them more this way.
And now as a bonus, I recently came across this clip again. Many of you have probably seen it before, but I am guessing it has been a while and this is one of those clips (for of those of you who like this sort of thing) that are still enjoyable on a repeat viewing.